Atlantic Business Channel

« An interview with George Akerlof | Main | Could the Housing Crisis have been Avoided? »

Feb 19 2009, 10:49 am

Stem cells: time to put some money down?

So now that the Obama administration looks set to change the Bush administration's restrictions on stem cell research, is it time to invest in the area? Only with money you can absolutely afford to lose, in my opinion.

There are several reasons for this. For one thing, the administration hasn't acted yet, and a few people who expected immediate action are starting to wonder if that means something unpleasant. But even when the rules change, the effect on the stocks of publicly traded companies is probably going to be mostly psychological. That's because the Bush rules applied only to government funding, a fact that all too many people forget. Private industry has been free to plow right ahead as it sees fit, and it has. Companies like Geron have been working on embryonic stem cells the whole time, with no NIH money involved.
Another thing to remember is that several of the companies in this area work on adult-derived stem cells, rather than embryonic ones. StemCells, Inc. is one such - their stock moves around according to sentiment in this sector, but you have to wonder if many of the people trading it even realize how meaningless the embryonic stem cell restrictions are for the company. (They used to be called CytoTherapeutics, actually, but changed their name in 2000, presumably to take advantage of the publicity).

And finally, there's a really big reason that it might be a bit early to put anything other than your wild-eyed longshot funds into this area: we don't know much about it at all. The signals that regulate stem cell development are only just beginning to be worked out, and we're probably going to have to know a lot more about such things before we can have a reasonable shot at therapies. The recent case of apparent tumor generation from a Russian stem cell therapy attempt (which operation had already shown no benefit, I should add) is one sobering reminder of how ignorant we are in this area. Tissue development is hideously complicated stuff, and the potential for things to go wrong is equally, well, hideous. Primum non nocere applies here good and hard; we're going to have to move carefully to avoid causing all kinds of harm.

That's not welcome news to the patients who need help, or the investors looking for breakthroughs. (And I won't even mention the politicians who like to talk as if those breakthroughs are just about to emerge). But this is the real situation. It looks to be many years before any reliable, useful stem-cell-based therapy appears, and there are going to be a lot of painful episodes along the way. Count on that, and invest carefully.

Comments (2)

So now that the Obama administration looks set to change the Bush administration's restrictions on stem cell research

Why can't a professional journalist get the basic facts correct. George Bush never restricted stem cell research and stem cell research in general was never part of the political firestorm in the first place; it was embryonic stem cell research and Bush never restricted that either. You later acknowledge that the "Bush rules applied only to government funding" which is more accurate. George Bush was the first and only president to ever allocate a single penny to embryonic stem cell research and he never restricted the research itself. He merely restricted federal funding to research utilizing stem cell lines in existence in the summer of 2001 as opposed to, for example, new lines created from left over embryos at fertility clinics.

In contrast, Bill Clinton never allocated a penny of federal money to embryonic stem cell research despite the fact that embryonic stem cells were isolated at the Univ. of Wisconsin in 1998. Clinton originally hid behind the Dickey Amendment but still failed to provide federal funding when, in 1999, the National Bioethics Advisory Commission recommended that "hESC harvested from embryos discarded after in vitro fertility treatments, but not from embryos created expressly for experimentation, be eligible for federal funding." Clinton had two years to act on this recommendation but failed to do so. The compromise was eventually adopted by the Bush Administration for which he is still being vilified.

The bottom line, get the basic facts straight you knucklehead. Your article states the obvious fact that whatever Obama does regarding embryonic stem cell research funding, it won't have any impact on adult stem cell therapies that have already shown positive results.

Dr. Lowe's not a professional journalist, he's a research scientist. You might want to get your own facts straight before calling people names.