
« Let Tim Geithner Be Beautiful | Main | Apple and Google 'Probe Launched' »
May 5 2009, 8:53 am by Conor Clarke
Has the Housing Market Hit Bottom?

Comments (5)
Today's Headlines From The Atlantic
technology Pac Rat
The fight to save video games from bit rot
china Cyber Warriors
The battle to protect our infrastructure from hackers
column Prison Porn
"Lockup" is exploitative and debasing
VOICES
The Latest From Leon, Ctd 2.9.10 8:41 P.M.
Shoe, Meet the Other Foot, Part II 2.9.10 5:19 P.M.
Procedure-Propism 2.9.10 4:47 P.M.
Live From Death Row 2.9.10 4:00 P.M.
Tonights aviation-mishap report 2.9.10 8:49 P.M.
The Middle East Comes to Irvine 2.9.10 4:38 P.M.
Liberal condescension 2.9.10 1:48 P.M.
Disney's Great Quarter
Is Banking About Trust?
The Scariest Employment Graph I've Seen This Year
Google Buzz Threatens Facebook, Gets Along with Twitter
Does Scott Brown Spell Change?
Win or lose, does Scott Brown spell change? Insight on CNBC's The Kudlow Report with Mark Tapscott, Washington Examiner and Megan McArdle, The Atlantic Business & Economics Editor....
Multimedia
McArdle v. Noah On Health Care Reform
Video
Megan McArdle on Health Care, Debt and Obama
Video
Larry Summers on the Global Economy
Weekly
Author
- Arnold Kling
- Anal_yst
- Adam Pasick
- Ben Adler
- Bob Cohn
- Benjamin Lockwood
- Ben Bradley
- Bart Wilson
- Conor Clarke
- Clive Crook
- Charles Davi
- Conor Friedersdorf
- Chris Good
- Cyra Master
- Clement Tan
- Daniel Indiviglio
- Derek Lowe
- Dr. Manhattan
- Derek Thompson
- Economics of Contempt
- Eric Werker
- Francis X. McArdle
- Gregory Clark
- Grant McCracken
- Graeme Wood
- Harvey Wallbanger
- James Fallows
- James Gibney
- J.J. Gould
- Joshua Green
- Jim Manzi
- Jenny Merkin
- Justin Miller
- Jeffrey Young
- Kerry Golds
- Marc Ambinder
- Matthew Cooper
- Mindles H. Dreck
- Megan Hupp
- Max Fisher
- Mackie Jimbo
- Menachem Kaiser
- Madeleine Kennedy
- Michael Kinsley
- Megan McArdle
- Matt Miller
- Marion Nestle
- Mike Konczal
- Nicole Allan
- Niraj Chokshi
- Paul Ormerod
- Peter Suderman
- Rob Atkinson
- Ryan Avent
- Ross Douthat
- Richard Florida
- Regina Herzlinger
- Ryan McClafferty
- Richard A. Posner
- Reihan Salam
- Steven Landsburg
- Tyler Cowen
- Virginia Postrel
- William Haseltine
- Nina and Tim Zagat
Monthly
Category
Home |
Atlantic FAQ |
Masthead |
Site Guide |
Subscribe |
Subscriber Help
Atlantic Store |
Educational Program |
Jobs/Internships |
Privacy Policy |
Terms and Conditions |
Feedback |
Advertise
Copyright © 2010 by The Atlantic Monthly Group. All rights reserved.






The big volume is caused by the low prices. Hitting bottom will vary from market to market (i.e. city to city). Sacramento is the state capital of California so it is buffered somewhat from the recession buffeting California (i.e. just like DC is doing OK). This means that Sacramento might recover quicker than some other California cities.
Californians have been trained to think houses should cost $500,000. Now that cheap foreclosures in Sacramento are more like $150,000, people have decided they have to be bargains. And they still think as soon as the economy recovers, prices will zoom again.
Still addicted to housing-as-investment in other words. In the words of Homer Simpson, "I haven't learned a thing."
We'll see.
Conor,
I am out in California, although in Orange County (ground zero for the sub prime industry) rather than Sacramento.
In terms of volume (number of houses sold) we may be near a bottom, although I am skeptical. The reason I am skeptical is that I think that we are no where near a bottom on price.
I think that there are three factors to look at in declaring a bottom for price (call it cdm's Corollary for the Housing Price Bottom, if you will):
1) The median home price for any designated neighborhood needs to be at 3 x median household income for the same neighborhood (this is a measure of basic affordability).
2) "Distressed" homes need to make up less than 10% of inventory (economists who studied the last big drop in California (mid 90's) seem to think that distressed inventory above ten percent is destabilizing to prices).
3) Unemployment needs to be below 7% (Unemployment has a destabilizing effect on both supply and demand). Why 7%? It is a number that just feels about right.
I do not think we will have a bottom until we see all three in concert.
Right now, I think that we are seeing a little bit of a false bottom, due in part to an anomaly in foreclosure numbers. Late last year, California had established a new waiting period that was intended to ensure that servicers took the time to contact borrowers that were in default. This led to a drastic drop in the number of NOD's (notice of defaults - the first step in foreclosure), and a corresponding drop in subsequent NTS and TS (Notice of Trustee Sale and Trustee Sale - the auction on the courthouse steps - respectively). However, NOD's have not only gone up as the servicers have processed through the new waiting period, they have set a new record! (http://www.dqnews.com/Articles/2009/News/California/CA-Foreclosures/RRFor090422.aspx)
My guess is that we will see in California and most other hard hit areas an over-correction down through and below the affordability factor that I stated, as the foreclosures and the unemployment issues will keep pushing prices lower. Of course, there are some smaller variables at play as well (baby boomers and their predicted future preference for smaller housing, interest rates, etc.), but I do not think these factors will be be determining like the other three will be.
I have also posted on this at the IHB forum ( http://www.irvinehousingblog.com/forums/viewthread/5122/ ), which is a forum that discusses the housing situation, with an emphasis on Orange County.
I also put this on my own blog here: http://cdmpolitics.blogspot.com/2009/05/housing-bottom.html
Dissenters may feel free to light me up there as well (but please keep it clean!).