<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/06/whats_up_with_these_dumb_pornographic_fast_food_ads.php" />
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://business.theatlantic.com/atom.xml" />
	<id>tag:business.theatlantic.com,2009://3/tag:business.theatlantic.com,2009://3.20151-</id>
	<updated>2009-11-03T19:58:12Z</updated>
	<title>Comments for What&apos;s Up with These Dumb, Pornographic Fast Food Ads?</title>
	
	<generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.24-en</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:business.theatlantic.com,2009://3.20151</id>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/06/whats_up_with_these_dumb_pornographic_fast_food_ads.php" />
		<link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://business.theatlantic.com/mt-42/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=3/entry_id=20151" title="What's Up with These Dumb, Pornographic Fast Food Ads?" />
		<published>2009-06-25T21:10:57Z</published>
		<updated>2009-06-26T18:38:55Z</updated>
		<title>What&apos;s Up with These Dumb, Pornographic Fast Food Ads?</title>
		<summary>In marketing, I suppose it&apos;s something of a syllogism that if you make an advertisement that combines food with sexual innuendo -- like this new thing from Burger King -- you&apos;ve got a winner on your hands. There&apos;s only one...</summary>
		<author>
			<name>Derek Thompson</name>
			<uri>http://www.theatlantic.com/</uri>
		</author>
		
		<category term="Promo" />
		
		<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://business.theatlantic.com/">
			<![CDATA[In marketing, I suppose it's something of a syllogism that if you make an advertisement that combines food with sexual innuendo -- like <a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/__XCWUd8FFjQ/SkE5a3F-vrI/AAAAAAAAHR8/iVeLTGyfALs/s1600-h/BKsevenincher.jpg">this new thing from Burger King</a> -- you've got a winner on your hands. There's only one problem: It's not true. There's <a href="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1975697.cms">this study</a> that shows that overtly sexy ads don't work on women. And <a href="http://trendsupdates.com/why-sexy-ads-don%E2%80%99t-necessarily-work/">these studies</a> showing sexy ads drown out the product, diminish brand recall, and often don't reap dividends even when the product is directed only at men. So why do marketers do it? (Also, let's look at some ads and talk about how stupid they are!<object height="344" width="425">)<br /></object>]]>
			<![CDATA[<br />Probably for the same reasons dogs chase their tail and Republicans
call for tax cuts. It's what they do, so it's got to be right. Here are
some taxes, let's cut them! You're in a commercial, put on a bikini!
Overtly sexual advertising is everywhere, but it's the <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=1&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FLaffer_curve&amp;ei=QtZDSqStIJPIMZfy_aYB&amp;usg=AFQjCNFdFlQmS7c_t_WsGU3o7OjjS6R59Q&amp;sig2=ycamxMLBr3c7JtG7Q3pMGA">Laffer curve</a> of the marketing industry.<br /><br />It's interesting to me that the more successful companies, including food, rarely go the route of "let's seduce/confuse our consumers with sex." McDonald's commercials
are basically a United Colors of Benetton ad, with french fries. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pv8YgrqUCVU">Coke Zero commercials</a>
feature middle-management types carrying on about the legal liabilities
of their product. Subway ads are <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHIo4VruGZY">a jingle turned into the song that
never ends</a>. ("Five..")<br /><br />But not Hardee's! Along with their sibling chain Carl's Jr, Hardee's is a decently profitable company (<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHIo4VruGZY">especially in the recession</a>) that still has to shout to be heard over its more beefy brothers McDonald's, BK and Wendy's. Except instead of yelling, they're making balls jokes and asking reality stars to roll around in the sand with their burgers. Strategic marketing! Let's watch and cry.<br /><br /><i>(Editor's Note: sort of NSFW, but they'll be on TV anyway, so the S stands for suitable)</i><br /><br /><embed src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f8/1543292789" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashvars="videoId=27550583001&amp;playerId=1543292789&amp;viewerSecureGatewayURL=https://console.brightcove.com/services/amfgateway&amp;servicesURL=http://services.brightcove.com/services&amp;cdnURL=http://admin.brightcove.com&amp;domain=embed&amp;autoStart=false&amp;" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swliveconnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash" height="412" width="486"><br /><br /><object height="340" width="560"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/lSmNTqZ3wV4&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><br /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/lSmNTqZ3wV4&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" height="340" width="560"></object><br /><br />
<object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hDZPU_m9fxQ&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><br /><object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hDZPU_m9fxQ&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hDZPU_m9fxQ&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" height="344" width="425"></object><br /><br /><br />I'll say, that is some fine-looking smut. Allow me to retort, in kind: 1) No, I do not want to name your balls. I will not be trying them, either. 2) Padma, my dear, <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/showtracker/2009/03/the-chopping--1.html">take your bacon and go.</a> 3) What I love about this commercial is that they're actually advertising the <i>fruit</i> in that giga-calorie monstrosity. Genius! It's like telling a team of urban planners they should check out Transformers II because streets are involved. Also, Audrina, how many burgers did they make you eat? I counted three. And I counted one up-chuck reflex at 0:05.<br /><br />Via {<a href="http://gawker.com/5302481/all-food-ads-now-hardcore-porn">Gawker</a>}<br />
</object><br />]]>
		</content>
	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>tag:business.theatlantic.com,2009://3.20151-comment:216154</id>
		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:business.theatlantic.com,2009://3.20151" type="text/html" href="http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/06/whats_up_with_these_dumb_pornographic_fast_food_ads.php"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/06/whats_up_with_these_dumb_pornographic_fast_food_ads.php#comment-216154" />
		<title>Comment from Derivative Dribble on 2009-06-26</title>
		<author>
				<name>Derivative Dribble</name>
				<uri></uri>
		</author>
		<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
				<![CDATA[<p>Forbidden donut...</p>]]>
		</content>
		<published>2009-06-26T14:08:23Z</published>
	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>tag:business.theatlantic.com,2009://3.20151-comment:216230</id>
		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:business.theatlantic.com,2009://3.20151" type="text/html" href="http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/06/whats_up_with_these_dumb_pornographic_fast_food_ads.php"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/06/whats_up_with_these_dumb_pornographic_fast_food_ads.php#comment-216230" />
		<title>Comment from Office Drone Number 46 on 2009-06-26</title>
		<author>
				<name>Office Drone Number 46</name>
				<uri></uri>
		</author>
		<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
				<![CDATA[<p>I get that these ads are trying to be ironic. Ha.</p>

<p>But the reason these ads don't work is that the ad is more about mocking advertising than it is about the product. And, the only people who really find these ads funny are college guys who still think it's funny to fart on each other. (And who will someday grow up to be ad execs? Just a theory.)</p>

<p>So, it's a double fail. Fails at humor. Fails at selling the product.</p>]]>
		</content>
		<published>2009-06-26T15:14:18Z</published>
	</entry>

</feed>