<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/06/will_the_new_iphone_save_journalism.php" />
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://business.theatlantic.com/atom.xml" />
	<id>tag:business.theatlantic.com,2009://3/tag:business.theatlantic.com,2009://3.19000-</id>
	<updated>2009-11-03T19:58:52Z</updated>
	<title>Comments for Will the New iPhone Save Journalism?</title>
	
	<generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.24-en</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:business.theatlantic.com,2009://3.19000</id>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/06/will_the_new_iphone_save_journalism.php" />
		<link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://business.theatlantic.com/mt-42/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=3/entry_id=19000" title="Will the New iPhone Save Journalism?" />
		<published>2009-06-09T15:42:14Z</published>
		<updated>2009-06-09T15:45:35Z</updated>
		<title>Will the New iPhone Save Journalism?</title>
		<summary>Let&apos;s follow the logic. Apple iPhones can now buy movies and TV shows just like a computer. What about magazines? Maybe them too: an application called Scrollmotion says it hopes to offer on the iPhone &quot;50 major magazines, 170 daily...</summary>
		<author>
			<name>Derek Thompson</name>
			<uri>http://www.theatlantic.com/</uri>
		</author>
		
		<category term="Promo" />
		
		<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://business.theatlantic.com/">
			<![CDATA[Let's follow <a href="http://gawker.com/5283420/will-the-new-iphone-save-old-media?skyline=true&amp;s=x">the logic</a>. Apple iPhones can now buy movies and TV shows just like a computer. What about magazines? Maybe them too: an application called Scrollmotion says it hopes to offer on the iPhone "50 major magazines, 170 daily newspapers and 1 million books," possibly including <em>Esquire </em>and <em>Bon Appetit</em>. Is the stage set for iPhone to cash in on that grand-daddy of&nbsp; journalism life preservers: The iTunes of Journalism?<br />]]>
			<![CDATA[<br />We've heard this before. The New York Times' David Carr <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/12/business/media/12carr.html">suggested</a>
last year that journo publishers come together to build an online store
that offered articles and magazines from premium sources the way iTunes
offers songs and albums. Gawker, which has picked up the meme, drops
the snark and starts thinking seriously about a iTunes or Hulu for the
press:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>Magazine and newspaper publishers might prefer to put together their
own iPhone store, just as the TV studios set up the video-sharing site
Hulu. Apple's terms would let them keep 70 percent of the sale price of
their content -- a pretty good deal in comparison to selling content on
the Kindle, where Amazon and its wireless carrier reportedly <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/amazon_wants_70_of_newspaper_revenue_for_kindle_distribution-2.html">keep close to 70 percent</a> of the money.<br />
</blockquote>
There's a few challenges to this. One that writer Ryan Tate notes is
why in the world would you go through a publisher's landing page to
read something that's only a URL away? There are plenty of other good
reasons why an iTunes for music would not work:<br />
<br />
1) Music isn't <a href="http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/01/14/an-itunes-model-for-news-more-difficult-than-you-think/">disposable</a>.
You don't listen to it once, you buy it to savor for months or years.
When was the last time you felt that way about a Maureen Dowd column?<br />
<br />
2) Music is <a href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/01/12/penny-for-his-thoughts/">unique</a>.
Most news is not. If I like U2, it doesn't follow that I will like
every band covering U2. But if there's an election in, say, Iran, I don't
need the New York Times to <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=election+iran&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a">read about it</a>. Cover artistry works much better in journalism than music.<br />
<br />
3) Also, here's media maven <a href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/01/12/penny-for-his-thoughts/">Jeff Jarvis</a>: "Even if Carr had a unique idea here, the essence of it--without
guitar accompaniment--can spread without having to hear him sing the
tune. Information isn't art. Neither are opinions."<br />
<br />
Well that hurts! I think opinions are a bit like art.* Good opinions, anyway. Yes, I'm <i>in</i>
the opinion business -- and perhaps this is just the evolutionary genes
screaming "Fight!" -- but I do think that readers will pay more for
opinions they trust and learn from. That's why the rather expensive
Economist is selling like hotcakes while Newsweek is in the process of
reinvention. News is a commodity. But opinion and voice that
distinguishes itself is inherently not. A year of the Economist costs
more than $100. Could an iTunes for world opinion and analysis
journalism beat that? I think it could.<br /><br />
<br />
<i>*Theoretically unique? Sometimes elegant? Often misunderstood? Check, check, check.</i><br />]]>
		</content>
	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>tag:business.theatlantic.com,2009://3.19000-comment:207115</id>
		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:business.theatlantic.com,2009://3.19000" type="text/html" href="http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/06/will_the_new_iphone_save_journalism.php"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/06/will_the_new_iphone_save_journalism.php#comment-207115" />
		<title>Comment from aratunes on 2009-06-09</title>
		<author>
				<name>aratunes</name>
				<uri></uri>
		</author>
		<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
				<![CDATA[<p>iTunes is not helpnig music, but for a chuckle read:     New Release: Art + iPhone= iPhart Raises Eyebrows  at <a href="http://www.aratunes.us">Unbelievably Great Music</a></p>]]>
		</content>
		<published>2009-06-09T17:07:43Z</published>
	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>tag:business.theatlantic.com,2009://3.19000-comment:207122</id>
		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:business.theatlantic.com,2009://3.19000" type="text/html" href="http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/06/will_the_new_iphone_save_journalism.php"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/06/will_the_new_iphone_save_journalism.php#comment-207122" />
		<title>Comment from Derek Thompson on 2009-06-09</title>
		<author>
				<name>Derek Thompson</name>
				<uri></uri>
		</author>
		<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
				<![CDATA[<p>Aratunes, thanks for writing. iTunes might not be "helping" music, but at least it's monetizing music. Free, as somebody said in one of the articles I linked to, might be easy for journalism, but it's not a business strategy.</p>]]>
		</content>
		<published>2009-06-09T17:10:54Z</published>
	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>tag:business.theatlantic.com,2009://3.19000-comment:207273</id>
		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:business.theatlantic.com,2009://3.19000" type="text/html" href="http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/06/will_the_new_iphone_save_journalism.php"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/06/will_the_new_iphone_save_journalism.php#comment-207273" />
		<title>Comment from Bobeda on 2009-06-09</title>
		<author>
				<name>Bobeda</name>
				<uri></uri>
		</author>
		<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
				<![CDATA[<p>I have more optimism for this idea than one thrown out at a Journalism School's "Rethinking News" summit I attended last month. Someone there suggested that Apple should build an electronic paper device that would resemble - these are their words, not mine - a disposable cutting board. You could roll it up and take it to the beach, they said. </p>

<p>I found this absurd for two reasons: <br />
1.Who takes a newspaper to a beach? If I get an afternoon to lay on the beach, I'm reading Sedaris or Salinger.<br />
2.A cutting board, no matter how pliable, doesn't fit in my pocket. I want news on my laptop at home and work, and in my pocket for everywhere in between. </p>

<p>So maybe an iTunes model is worth a shot. At least I can put that news in my pocket. </p>]]>
		</content>
		<published>2009-06-09T19:37:11Z</published>
	</entry>

</feed>