Atlantic Business Channel

« When Blogs Were Young | Main | Should Journalists Be Entertainers? »

Jul 2 2009, 11:50 am

California's Deficit Plan Now Includes IOUs

California lawmakers failed to agree on deficit measures to close the state's $24 billion budget shortfall on the eve of July 4 weekend. As a result, the state controller said he will start paying some of the state's bills with IOUs. At this point, the state has 45 days to solve the deficit. After that deadline, lawmakers are constitutionally unable to actually make law or adjourn until budget provisions are passed to close the shortfall. This is absolutely dreadful, not to mention embarrassing, news for the state, but apparently the treasury is getting creative. Its solution? Split the state in half.
No, not literally -- the San Andreas fault won't be primed. Instead State Treasurer Bill Lockyer wants to write two different budgets. One for the liberal coast and one for the conservative regions inland. How would this work? He explains, "We'll have the budget for the coast that has tax increases and services ... And in a bunch of other areas in Central and Southern California that don't have tax increases . . . their public schools are closed a month of the year -- and see what happens." Effectively treating California as two different states funded under separate budgets is an idea that likely won't be cheered by the public, even if it's a fascinating experiment in "reap what you sow" that could teach Californians about the impact of their tax dollars. But on the other hand, this is the alternative: 28,742 IOUs worth $53.3 million, mostly sent to residents awaiting tax refunds. The only thing worse that creating a showdown between the Cali Republic and the State of Fornia is a single state running on fake money.



Comments (5)

Joshua Lyle

I like it. In fact, why stop at splitting it two ways? Why not really embrace the just option and split the California budget by the number of people in California, letting each of them make their own budget?

I believe this is called an ad-hoc PIK-toggle, although atypical in most credit agreements, these things are usually negotiated and agreed-upon explicitly in advance.

I love it though, CA issues bonds to their cash-strapped citizenry, then instead of defaulting on those bonds they issue new "debt" to the same over-leveraged citizens, further perpetuating the cash shortfall.

I just don't see the problem, how could this NOT work out swimmingly?

I'd love to see this "experiment" happen - particularly if it was really fair. Let each legislature (one from each side) present the governor with laws that only affect their own constituents.

Vouchers for the conservatives; huge school unions for the liberals.

Benefits for Citizens on one side; MORE benefits for EVERYONE on the other.

Lower taxes inland; higher at the coast.

Only one rule: for the duration of the experiment, no moving. Because once the conservative side actually recovers, we'll end up with yet another California Liberal influx screwing it up...

Various areas of California are very different culturally. The inland portions probably would prefer to be governed by Texas instead of Sacramento. And the third of the state north of Sacramento has long complained they just can't afford all the benefits and regulations that the more urban areas of the state support.

The state really is too big anyway. If they have a new constitutional convention, I hope splitting it up is on the agenda (not holding my breath!)

Sounds like a worthy experiment. The federal government should also pick up the cost of illegal aliens (in terms of medical, educational, prisons, etc).