<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/07/is_bing_really_better_than_google.php" />
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://business.theatlantic.com/atom.xml" />
	<id>tag:business.theatlantic.com,2009://3/tag:business.theatlantic.com,2009://3.20963-</id>
	<updated>2009-11-03T19:57:17Z</updated>
	<title>Comments for Is Microsoft Bing Really Better Than Google?</title>
	
	<generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.24-en</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:business.theatlantic.com,2009://3.20963</id>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/07/is_bing_really_better_than_google.php" />
		<link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://business.theatlantic.com/mt-42/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=3/entry_id=20963" title="Is Microsoft Bing Really Better Than Google?" />
		<published>2009-07-09T15:33:53Z</published>
		<updated>2009-07-09T15:39:19Z</updated>
		<title>Is Microsoft Bing Really Better Than Google?</title>
		<summary>David Pogue seems to be making some waves with a frank and surprising review of Microsoft&apos;s new search engine Bing. Pogue, reviewing for the New York Times, finds that not only does Bing compete with Google, but in some ways...</summary>
		<author>
			<name>Derek Thompson</name>
			<uri>http://www.theatlantic.com/</uri>
		</author>
		
		<category term="Promo" />
		
		<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://business.theatlantic.com/">
			<![CDATA[David Pogue seems to be making some waves with a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/09/technology/personaltech/09pogue.html?hp">frank and surprising review of Microsoft's new search engine Bing</a>. Pogue, reviewing for the New York Times, finds that not only does Bing compete with Google, but in some ways it's actually much better. For example, scrolling over results reveals a pop-up balloon in which you can glance at the contents before clicking. Cool! In a panel to the left of the search results it suggests more specific searches, so if you're a girl <strike>Googling</strike> Binging Johnny Depp, Bing will offer News, Movies, Quotes, Biography and Images. Useful! <br /><br />So for the first time since I first wrote about Bing's launch, I gave it a whirl. And you know what? It really might be better than Google.<br />]]>
			<![CDATA[<br />The first thing to note about Bing and Google is that their search
results are essentially twins. Not fraternal twins, where you can see a
resemblance only when you squint and compare noses. They're more like
identical twins. The best place to test and verify this identical
twinship is on the new site<a href="http://bing-vs-google.com/"> Bing vs. Google</a>,
which allows you to search a phrase and see the results from Bing and
Google in side-by-side windows. In search after search -- on <a href="http://bing-vs-google.com/?q=life+expectancy+Russia">life-expectancy in Russia</a>, <a href="http://bing-vs-google.com/?q=Michael+Jackson%27s+greatest+song">Michael Jackson's greatest song</a>, <a href="http://bing-vs-google.com/?q=buy+Dell+computer">buy Dell computer</a> -- you get the same sites, in the same font, in a slightly different order.<br />
<br />
But Bing has taken its twin to beauty school and enrolled her in
intense summer classes, and as a result, you have a search engine that
looks better and acts smarter than Google search. First of all, let's
talk about looks. Every day, the Bing homepage changes to feature a
striking full-window photo with roll-over icons that teach you about
the place featured. That's just cosmetic, but when you enter a search,
you can click to the right side of the results to see a "pop-up
balloon" that helps you preview each page before you decide to read it.
Below, I've searched for Andy Rooney, and you can see the pop-up box to
the right of the five grumpy faces (the arrow is mine, not Bing's).<br />
<br />
<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="580 andy rooney.png" src="http://business.theatlantic.com/580%20andy%20rooney.png" class="mt-image-center" style="margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;" height="347" width="580" /></span>
If you don't find preview boxes useful, no sweat. They don't get in your way of
scanning what is otherwise essentially a Google results page.<br />
<br />
But wait, there's more! The left panel of suggested searches is a really useful
tool -- for shopping or for researching online. For example, if
hypochondriacs like me take our silly hourly health concerns to Bing,
the site suggests more specific searches, which are less likely to turn up stupid results (read: exotic diseases). Here are the results for
"headache":<br />
<br />
<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="580 headache.png" src="http://business.theatlantic.com/580%20headache.png" class="mt-image-center" style="margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;" height="351" width="580" /></span>
The left column provides both commonsense sub-topics -- like Symptoms
and Relief -- and logical further searches. I <i>do</i> want to learn about
the different types of headaches -- what's the difference between sinus
and tension and stress varieties, anyway? This is how Bing takes your
search, and then begins to <i>thinks for you</i>.<br />
<br />
To be sure, there are plenty of people who don't want to be thought
for. They know what they're looking for and they'll find it for
themselves in the main search box, thank you very much. And for them,
there is happy news: Google isn't going anywhere. But what's nice about
Bing is that it <i>is</i> Google. It's just not afraid to look pretty, or hold your hand.<br />]]>
		</content>
	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>tag:business.theatlantic.com,2009://3.20963-comment:222251</id>
		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:business.theatlantic.com,2009://3.20963" type="text/html" href="http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/07/is_bing_really_better_than_google.php"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/07/is_bing_really_better_than_google.php#comment-222251" />
		<title>Comment from xman on 2009-07-09</title>
		<author>
				<name>xman</name>
				<uri></uri>
		</author>
		<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
				<![CDATA[<p>so far BING is winning cuz I just alpha launched my site www.inlineasp.com went to add my site to google, yahoo, and bing all same time. Next day I search all of them for inlineasp.com, only bing shows what I expects. Two weeks now Google and yahoo...still nothing!</p>]]>
		</content>
		<published>2009-07-09T16:27:42Z</published>
	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>tag:business.theatlantic.com,2009://3.20963-comment:222589</id>
		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:business.theatlantic.com,2009://3.20963" type="text/html" href="http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/07/is_bing_really_better_than_google.php"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/07/is_bing_really_better_than_google.php#comment-222589" />
		<title>Comment from TheGlue29 on 2009-07-09</title>
		<author>
				<name>TheGlue29</name>
				<uri></uri>
		</author>
		<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
				<![CDATA[<p>So because Bing pulls up your website, it's winning??  Okay.</p>

<p>I tried Bing and I didn't like it, but then again I'm not some Sally who only reads TMZ or Perez Hilton, and when I do a Google search, I know what to put in the search bar to find what I want.</p>

<p>I found that when I'm overly specific in Bing, the results are not at all what I'm looking for.  I've been doing overly specific search engine sites since I primarily used Altavista back in 97 and 98.  </p>

<p>I'm not going to dumb down my search style just to use MS's new product in their ongoing quest to monopolize every industry in the world.</p>]]>
		</content>
		<published>2009-07-09T20:14:58Z</published>
	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>tag:business.theatlantic.com,2009://3.20963-comment:223379</id>
		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:business.theatlantic.com,2009://3.20963" type="text/html" href="http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/07/is_bing_really_better_than_google.php"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/07/is_bing_really_better_than_google.php#comment-223379" />
		<title>Comment from Brewer Caldwell on 2009-07-10</title>
		<author>
				<name>Brewer Caldwell</name>
				<uri></uri>
		</author>
		<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
				<![CDATA[<p>I love this article about Bing because I agree with everything it says. Bing is definitely prettier. Google only dresses up on holidays. I look forward to those photographs all the time. As a person that loves to travel but doesn't get to as much as I'd like (yet!) it has shown me places I 've never thought of going or even knew existed. When I switched from Altavista to Google back in the 90's it was hard and I resisted but this is a smooth easy transisition. <a href="http://www.azresidentialrentals.com">Brewer Caldwell</a></p>]]>
		</content>
		<published>2009-07-10T17:16:29Z</published>
	</entry>

</feed>