"a person living in Wenatchee, Washington would get an extra 13 weeks of benefits. The unemployment rate in Wenatchee is 5.9%. Meanwhile, a person living in McAllen, Texas, where the unemployment rate is 11.6%, would not get any additional benefits. That's because 8.9% of workers in Washington are unemployed, while 8.1% of those in Texas are"She suggested that benefit extensions should perhaps go to counties with high unemployment rather than states, but obviously that runs in to the same problem of treating some unemployed people as more important than others. This Senate plan is a fairer idea, even if providing up to 20 additional weeks of benefits will be extremely costly.
« Will Online Health Plans Help Keep You Trim? | Main | The Public Plan Lives! Until the States Kill It »
Oct 8 2009, 4:40 pm
Senate Plans to Extend Jobless Benefits in Every State
The Senate announced a plan to extend unemployment benefits in every state by 14 weeks, and up to 20 weeks in states with high unemployment (more than 8.5 percent). We'll see if this passes, but it's much better than the earlier version of this bill, which would have only extended benefits in states with high unemployment. That was a rotten idea. As Barbara Kiviat from TIME wrote:










Maybe a better way would be to break it out by Congressional district.
but obviously that runs in to the same problem of treating some unemployed people as more important than others
This isn't a problem, but simply a recognition that the unemployed in some areas have more difficulty finding work than in others. It is more important that we target our programs to maximize their efficiency, rather than to maintain some sort of artificial "fairness" in which we neglect to factor any contextualness into our programs of this sort.
Easy to say when your not unemployed and about to have your house foreclosed.
What would keep you from moving to a high-unemployment state and applying for benefits there?
Why would anyone uproot themselves (and possibly their family) to move to a place like Michigan in which there are no jobs? Where would they get the money for such a move? First & last month's rent plus a security deposit will take away nearly any gains, plus having to live without a job to establish eligibility, etc etc.
With all due respect (really), I guess the answer to your question: common sense.