« The Curious Case of Bruce Bartlett | Main | Detroit Defines A Bad Real Estate Market »
Oct 26 2009, 4:10 pm
This is the End of the Newspaper Business
The circulation figures for the top 25 dailies in the US are out, and they're horrifying. The median decline is well into the teens; only the Wall Street Journal gained (very slightly).
I think we're witnessing the end of the newspaper business, full stop, not the end of the newspaper business as we know it. The economics just aren't there. At some point, industries enter a death spiral: too few consumers raises their average costs, meaning they eventually have to pass price increases onto their customers. That drives more customers away. Rinse and repeat . . .
For twenty years, newspapers have been trying to slow the process with increasingly desperate cost cutting, but almost all are at the end of that rope; they can't cut their newsroom or production staff any further and still put out a newspaper. There just aren't enough customers who are willing to pay for their product what it costs to produce it.
The numbers seem to confirm something I've thought for a while: we're eventually going to end up with a few national papers, a la Britain, rather than local dailies. The Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post, and the New York Times (sorry, conservatives!) are weathering the downturn better than most, and it's not surprising: business, politics, and national upper-middlebrow culture. But in 25 years, will any of them still be printing their product on the pulped up remains of dead trees? It doesn't seem all that likely.
I met a freelancer this weekend who is doing all the things that most journalists did to get where they are, writing on the margins of the news business in the hopes of getting up enough of a portfolio to worm her way into the center. I wanted to give her hope . . . but the fact is, at the center there are now more existing journalists than jobs for them, meaning the outsiders have very little chance.
Maybe there will be jobs, online. But if so, more web outfits are going to have to get into the habit of paying salaries that will support an adult middle-class life. Right now, a lot of web outfits tend to churn through twenty-somethings who are also building their resumes . . . but I'm not sure how well this works in a world where a job churning out blog copy for pennies a word is the last stop in a journalistic career, rather than the first.
I think we're witnessing the end of the newspaper business, full stop, not the end of the newspaper business as we know it. The economics just aren't there. At some point, industries enter a death spiral: too few consumers raises their average costs, meaning they eventually have to pass price increases onto their customers. That drives more customers away. Rinse and repeat . . .
For twenty years, newspapers have been trying to slow the process with increasingly desperate cost cutting, but almost all are at the end of that rope; they can't cut their newsroom or production staff any further and still put out a newspaper. There just aren't enough customers who are willing to pay for their product what it costs to produce it.
The numbers seem to confirm something I've thought for a while: we're eventually going to end up with a few national papers, a la Britain, rather than local dailies. The Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post, and the New York Times (sorry, conservatives!) are weathering the downturn better than most, and it's not surprising: business, politics, and national upper-middlebrow culture. But in 25 years, will any of them still be printing their product on the pulped up remains of dead trees? It doesn't seem all that likely.
I met a freelancer this weekend who is doing all the things that most journalists did to get where they are, writing on the margins of the news business in the hopes of getting up enough of a portfolio to worm her way into the center. I wanted to give her hope . . . but the fact is, at the center there are now more existing journalists than jobs for them, meaning the outsiders have very little chance.
Maybe there will be jobs, online. But if so, more web outfits are going to have to get into the habit of paying salaries that will support an adult middle-class life. Right now, a lot of web outfits tend to churn through twenty-somethings who are also building their resumes . . . but I'm not sure how well this works in a world where a job churning out blog copy for pennies a word is the last stop in a journalistic career, rather than the first.










This largely already exists, no? AP/Reuters/and a handful or two of national/global news outlets distribute content to the regional/locals.
You are entirely right, but you may still be wrong. I think (don't know) that for many newspapers with strong online presence, readership has soared. With increasing readership, how can the industry disappear? Change yes, disappear, no.
"...many newspapers with strong online presence, readership has soared."
Yes, but those online readers aren't subscribers, so there's no revenue there. Online ads bring in a small fraction of what print ads do, so little revenue from that quarter.
"With increasing readership, how can the industry disappear?"
Declining print subscriber money + declining print ad money + low online ad money + zero online subscriber money = bankruptcy. Bankrupt news companies can't produce content. That's how the industry disappears.
Printing presses get mothballed, production staff gets axed, editorial/etc staff get replaced with younger, cheaper labor...its already starting to happen, and has for some time.
Newspapers were dying anyway but the Internet has hastened the process by exposing the newspapers lack of accountability.
The average schmuck buys a paper and sees it as a product designed to inform him, the customer, about the world around him/her.
But in any financial transaction the customer is identified as the person who pays the money, and since newspapers only get 20% of revenue from subscribers this means the subscriber is not the “real” customer.
Newspapers get 80% of revenue from corporate advertisers, so they are the “real” customers. And since the corporate advertisers don’t take delivery of the newspapers it means the newspaper is not the real product.
The real product is the reader, and the newspaper is just a medium (like radio waves or tv signals) that is used to “deliver” the real product (our eyeballs) to the real customers (corporate advertisers). That’s why writing a letter to the editor is about as useful as shouting at the tv.
People are important in the newspaper financial model, just not in the way that they thought they were. And their need for factual, un-spun news reporting is secondary to the wants of the corporate advertisers and shareholders.
With the Internet, you can have news websites that have zero corporate advertising, which means they are ACCOUNTABLE to the subscribers who donate to the site. This is why the newspapers can’t simply transfer their business model onto the web and hope to survive.
It’s not about technology. It’s all about accountability.
Cheers.
Most of Europe also has these hyper-local free newspapers which are add-supported and report purely on local issues with only a couple of "general interest" columns and maybe a two sentence summary of the major national and international news.
They make a profit (they're normally a couple of pages only). They are also widely read by the subway-taking classes—most subway stations have them at the entrance, and often you drop them off when you get off for the next person.
What has disappear there, and will disappear in America, are city national newspapers.
This has been happening for 5-10 years. What were the publishers thinking? Print needs to migrate online - and monetize. In order to pay the professionals who produce the content, publishers will have to charge for it. Multiple revenue streams are needed. 2010 will be the Year of Paid Content. Will consumers pay for what they've been getting free? Who knows. The only way to find out is to try it. Maybe offering readers "many ways to pay" will ease the transition. See the model at http://www.PayCheckr.com